
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! December 6, 2004 The UncrediblesBy GreyhawkWatched The Incredibles on DVD today. Great film, easily worth the five bucks I paid for it. The only drawback is this new technique American filmmakers have adopted where they make a movie, then videotape a showing of it in a theater and then release that version of it. Must be the new craze; every movie I've seen since arriving in Iraq has used the technique... Yes, of course I'm kidding. I mean, there are no pirated movies in Iraq! There are no Tanks in Baghdad! The Americans are roasting in the fires of hell...! Damn, now you won't know what to believe. I've gone and damaged my credibility; become uncredible, if you will... Hey, is Washington Post Staff Writer Bradley Graham a reader here? Just curious, because he seems to have built this story around the theme Russ Vaughn used in filling Mrs. G's request for a Thanksgiving poem: A Sharp Shift From Killing to Kindness Here's an excerpt from Russ's version: How can you warriors fight through the night, Unlike other armies, you American G.I.'s Other nations see this and are amazed Wherever you serve, the world can see, And as Americans know and Russ explains here, this is absolutely not a new phenomenon. Quoting Stephen Ambrose: "When soldiers from any other army, even our allies, entered a town, the people hid in the cellars. When Americans came in, even into German towns, it meant smiles, chocolate bars and C-rations." The cliché American GI - alive and well, and hat tip to the Washington Post for not being afraid to say so. Another cliché came to life for me today. I was talking to one of the troops who spends a considerable amount of time working with non-military/non-government Iraqis in a very public location. I was concerned for how he was eating, since he was far from a DFAC and local diets can sometimes produce unwanted reactions in tourists and other invaders - something we already call "Saddam's Revenge". This guy was a recent arrival, and I wanted to make sure he knew where to get MREs to take with him for lunch. "No," he explained to my mild horror, "I've been eating with the Iraqis. Every day one of the guys brings the food for everyone. A different guy every day. Then we all eat lunch together." He went on to explain he ate only fully cooked foods, avoiding fresh raw vegetables that might have been washed in local water and anything he couldn't readily identify. "So how do they like having you as an extra mouth to feed?" I asked. "They love it. Man, being with those guys has completely changed my view of everything we're doing here." "How so?" "They just love us so much. They're so thankful we're here..." I didn't ask for clarification of the "changed my view" remark, just prompted him for more. "Really?" "Yea, they used to live in constant fear that they might screw up and end up dead for it. Now they know it's still dangerous but they have hope for the future. No, they think we're great. They're glad we're here." Damn, from time to time you read about Iraqis expressing appreciation for us, but every time you actually hear it from yet another person you get a great feeling, followed shortly after by a question of "why the hell doesn't this sort of story get told more often in the press back home?!? Now here's an American who to some degree has had his views on the war altered by Iraqis! The Iraqis who are feeding him! A guy who even though he's military has until now only had press reports of the war to help him form an opinion. And yes, I'm going to make sure the local chapter of the Michael Moore fan Club gets to hear from this guy first hand. So take heart, America, you have the incredibles; the Washington Post is starting to read like Mudville, and average Iraqis are converting lukewarm Americans to enthusiastic supporters of their struggle for freedom. Maybe soon letters to the editor like this one in the Washington Times (from an individual I do not know) will become unnecessary: As a soldier on the ground in Baghdad, I greatly appreciated Helle Dale's column ("Biased coverage in Iraq," Wednesday, Op-Ed). As sad as I am to say it, the media's bias here is willful. I'm here at what used to be Saddam Hussein's presidential palace, now the U.S. Embassy in the green zone. The word is getting out. We're winning. You can't hide that fact forever. Not if you care about damaging your credibility. Posted by Greyhawk / December 6, 2004 2:01 PM | Permalink 1 TrackBackIt's time to admit I'm never going to get around to doing individual posts on some things I saved links to last year and just say Read More 3 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
The villian SYNDROME looks to me like MICHEAL MOORE with his beard shaved off and i just wonder if they did,nt patern him after moore and they also villifi lawyers another great idea
Did you see Sen. Bidens comments?
"We've won everything we've tried to do, including Fallujah," Biden told ABC's "This Week." "But then we've lacked the resources to secure what we've won. And we're still paying an awesome price for the initial failures on policy of this administration, of going in with too little power and too little legitimacy."
Biden had just returned from a trip to Iraq with his Senate Foreign Relations Committee colleague Chuck Hagel, who told reporters on Thursday, "I did not find one commander who said to me, 'We're winning.'"
Biden said he agreed with that assessment, telling "This Week," "That's clearly my impression."
On the prospects for a successful Iraqi election in January, the Delaware Democrat was equally pessimistic, saying: "Success is still possible, but it is receding rapidly. It is being made much more difficult. And anybody who tells you - like we were told just prior to the November election - that Iraq is more secure, that is simply not true. Not true."
He predicted that American forces would continue to take an increasing number of casualties in Iraq, saying: "We have to level with the American people. This is going to be incredibly painful."
Biden's assessment, however, was contradicted by Pentagon officials, who said last week that attacks against U.S. forces had actually plummeted sharply in the wake of the Fallujah victory.
"Military officials report that attacks across all of Iraq have dropped from 130 to 50 per day," NBC's Pentagon correspondent, Jim Miklaszewski, reported on Monday.
The Delaware Democrat's pessimistic view also didn't jibe with comments from enemy leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who candidly admitted two weeks ago in an audiotaped message posted to an Islamic Web site that his forces were on the ropes after suffering a devastating defeat in Fallujah.
"Hundreds of thousands of the nation's sons are being slaughtered at the hands of the infidels," an alarmed Zarqawi announced.
Blaming Sunni clerics for not supporting his reign of terror, the enemy leader complained that U.S. forces were "inflicting the worst suffering, cutting the throats of the holy warriors."
"This Week" host George Stephanopoulos opted not to ask Sen. Biden about either the declining attack numbers or Zarqawi's admission of defeat.
This is all about 'context'. I've spoken to Iraqis in Baghdad on days when there's been '5 car bombs ripped throughout the city' - asked them about it - and they laugh at me because they don't know what I'm talking about. Baghdad is the size of Los Angeles. The entire country is the size of California. When the L.A. riots happened - I'm sure people in San Diego or San Francisco weren't worried it would 'spread' to them. It's ridiculous. I've explained this notion before to skeptical friends and family - and when I do - then they 'get it'. But if you only had the news to rely on - you'd be worried. Omar at Iraq the Model when visiting Jordan only had access to CNN and Al-Jazeera - he said he was fully expecting Baghdad to be GONE. But when he got home-he realized he had fallen victim to the media.