
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! June 12, 2004 Mothers Hide Your Sons...By GreyhawkThe video game industry will find them, and transform them into vicious, bloodthirsty killers, while convincing them that war is fun. "RPG! They've got an RPG!" hollers the team leader of a four-man U.S. Army infantry squad hiding behind a beat-up car on this battle-ridden street. Usually we must wait 'til near Christmas for assaults on the fun toys, but fortunately for ignorant, impressionable, and gullible young men everywhere USA Today reporter Mike Snyder is on a mission to save them. Though apparently lacking first hand knowledge, Mike gets quotes from Mary Spio, a gal whose credibility is seemingly enhanced by her Air Force service during the early 1990's: Mary Spio, 31, who served in the U.S. Air Force during the first Gulf War, thinks video games can create a bloodlust. "What we saw in the Abu Ghraib prison scandal was the tip of the iceberg ? it was a glimpse of a generation of war gamers coming of age," says Spio, now the pop culture editor for One2One Magazine. I don't usually read too much after the requisite "Abu Ghraib" paragraph in any news story, but you can go read the whole thing if you'd like. Afterwards you can vent your hostilities by playing the Army's own online wargame, via the link conveniently provided in the USA Today piece. And if after that you use your dog to terrify your neighbors into forming a naked human pyramid while you take digital video we'll blame USA Today. Posted by Greyhawk / June 12, 2004 5:04 PM | Permalink 1 TrackBack1) Greyhawk from The Mudville Gazette cracks my shit up: ...and if after that you use your dog to terrify your neighbors into forming a naked human pyramid while you take digital video we'll blame USA Today. 2) Diggs at... Read More 10 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
Great site, and I've been a long-time lurker, and this is the first topic I'm commenting upon.
As an infantryman I heard of this game a few months ago [in between forming quadrilaterals and trapezoids out of nude Afghani men], and once I saw it in action I knew immediately the press was going to jump on it, claiming the government is attempting to turn our young into mouth-foaming, saliva-dripping killers of Muslims.
"Video games that allow players to kill real human beings are desensitizing generations of American society," she says.
Huh? Haha, its a videogame; please explain to me how players are "kill[ing] real people"? And the 1980's game 'Paperboy' caused us all to throw junk into our neighbor's yards!
From what I saw of the game, it put a great deal of emphasis on teamwork and movement utilizing two fire teams in a complex environment, not playing as s singular soldier going gung-ho shooting everyone on sight. Heaven forbid a game puts an emphasis on *GASP* teamwork. Also from what I understand, it's rated "M" for "Mature", meaning you have to be 17+ years of age in order to purchase it.
If you saw my neighbors you wouldn't want to take any such photo, much less get the dog next to em while doing so.
Is it just me or must we shift responsibility away from the perp to either inanimate objects (guns for example) or influences that were controlling said perp (my dad used to beat me so I had all this unresolved anger inside).
Following that kind of logic I guess if I start playing one of my old Leisure Suit Larry games I am going to turn into a bar hoping sexist pig?
(oh ...wait...I already am)
I think these games should be labled for the over the hill gang that is unable to bear arms for the sake of our country. You fellows on the front know war is no game. Parents, wives ,husbands and children of those we have lost know it is no game.
And conversely people who play them know that games are not a war. Which is exactly the point you missed Pat.
Did you see this satire that Den Beste linked to a few weeks ago? Hysterical...
LINK
http://www.pointlesswasteoftime.com/games/wargames.html
I bought the game, and it's the best $60 I've spent this year.
If you're interested, I've just posted a longer review of it here
The murders at a high school in Paducah generated an interesting response from somebody familiar with the subject of computer games.
It is difficult, the writer said, to pull the trigger on a living human, especially at close range. That hesitation can cost a grunt his life if the first bad guy he sees pops up at nought feet with weapon leveled. When I was in, we did an exercise called "Quick Kill" using modified BB guns, whose purpose was ostensibly to teach us to shoot both-eyes like bird shooting, since we would not have time to line up in proper marksman fashion. It probably had the unspoken purpose to get us to pull without thinking.
Now, the Army uses computer games to get the guys to pull instantly. Whether this is desensitizing is an open question, but the object is to get the trigger pulled without going through the half-instant's necessity of deciding to kill a human.
It appears, according to one report, that the kid in Paducah did some absolutely fabulous shooting. He owned a laser-pistol game whose "weapon" had the same "point" as the pistol he eventually got, so he'd "fired" it a million times.
These games probably won't change anybody's philosophy, but they may change certain aspects of their reactions to particular situations.
Hey, hide your daughters too!
I used to be an online gamer...quite the nerdy thing for a girl of my age to be doing at the time.
And to blame video games is just one more example of the media portraying everyone as victims. The soldiers who took part in the abuse at abu Graib--they were victims of the administration, victims of the war...now victims of video games? Give me a break.
Many University studies have shown that, all things or influences being equal/neutral, little boys will STILL find themselves becoming attracted to toy guns and Tonka trucks, etc., whilst little girls will STILL be attracted to baby dolls, clothes, and doll houses, etc. IOW, although socializations are important, gender-specific natural instincts can take over even in the absence of any value system. I believe most armies would prefer to work with these instincts, not against it!
"Four man Infantry Squad" has this reviewer even played the game? In it you command two four man fire teams who make up an eight man squad.