The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« 1 June 04 Morning Briefing | Main | New MilBlog »

June 1, 2004

greyhawk copy sm.png

Yikes!

By Greyhawk

Sombody is handing us a load. Is it little Bobby Novak?:

The handful of valiant American warriors fighting the ''other'' war in Afghanistan is not a happy band of brothers. They are undermanned and feel neglected, lack confidence in their generals and are disgusted by Afghan political leadership. Most important, they are appalled by the immense but fruitless effort to find Osama bin Laden for purposes of U.S. politics.

This bleak picture goes unreported because journalists are rarely seen there. It was painted to me by hard U.S. fighters who are committed to the war against terrorism but have a heavy heart. They talked to me not to undermine policy but to reveal problems that should and can be corrected.

Afghanistan constitutes George W. Bush's clearest victory since the terrorist attacks of 9/11. The Taliban regime has been overthrown, eliminating al-Qaida's most important base. But the overlooked war continues with no end in sight. Narcotics trafficking is at an all-time high. If U.S. forces were to leave, the Taliban -- or something like it -- would regain power. The United States is lost in Afghanistan, bound to this wild country and unable to leave.

The situation in Afghanistan, as laid out to me, looks nothing like a country alleged to be progressing toward representative democracy under American tutelage. Hamid Karzai, the U.S.-sponsored Afghan president, is regarded by the U.S. troops as hopelessly corrupt and kept in power by U.S. force of arms.

Those arms are not what they seem. The basic U.S. strength in Afghanistan is 17,000 troops of ''straight-legged'' infantry -- conventional forces ill-prepared to handle irregulars. The new unit assigned to Afghanistan is the 25th Infantry Division, which has been stationed at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, and has not seen combat since the Vietnam War.

Or brother Hook?

And I hesitate to tell him about this since he's kinda busy fighting Osama and his crowd on one side and Reggie "I'm a better man than any GI anywhere" Rivers on the other, but damn! - this guy just dissed Hooks whole Division!

Sorry if this turns your otherwise rosy day sour Top, but I can't let it slide without bringing it to your attention.

Update: Hook responds.


Posted by Greyhawk / June 1, 2004 12:18 PM | Permalink

2 TrackBacks

Lost? from Sgt Hook on June 1, 2004 7:59 PM

Welcome to Sgt Hook’s editorial blog. At least it seems to be evolving into such. From time to time things pop up on the radar screen that get my Scottish blood pumping and thanks to Greyhawk (who publishes one of my favorite blogs), this is another on... Read More

And I don't mean that in a good way. Greyhawk finds the story and gets the blogosphere stirred up. Bob Novak, whacko reporter guy, completely misrepresents the 25th Infantry Division's plans and actions in Afghanistan. The handful of valiant American Read More

9 Comments

I think this jerk needs to go spend some quality time with Hook and the troops - let them SHOW him just how "ill-prepared" they are.

I agree Tammi! Jerk is too nice a word, btw...

Thanks for the heads up Hawk. I'll make time for this one.

No contest. Sgt Hook is "da Man". There is a real disconnect between the "boots on the ground" verses the media. The best explanation was from a young lady I talked to who served as an MP in Iraq. She said, "After the embeds went home, all reporting became Hotel Bar Journalism." Thank God for blogs!

I think hook gave it to him very well and professional. As he should.


In Spades.

And how is KERRY 's proposal to raise the active duty level by "40,000" going to help him save America from Bush's alleged "debacles" in Iraq and Afghanistan - its like empowering the Navy or Pacific Fleet by adding a GUNBOAT instead of a heavy BATTLESHIP OR CARRIER! I'm sure Osama's CAMELS will be running scared!

Reggie's good buddy at the Denver Post, Dani Newsum (a local Denver villiage idiot, now with a blog at the Post), has added on to it too....

http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36%257E29079%257E2191503,00.html

oh, and while you're at it, read her comments at:

http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36%257E29079%257E2194967,00.html

try not to wretch...

I complained to the editor! Text follows:

"Sir,
A Reggie Rivers has purportedly published an article through your efforts, likening America's soldiers to slaves, and the Armed Forces as
institutionalized slavery.

His article, while perhaps labeled opinion and permitted in a legal and technical sense, yet demeans your publication and besmirches YOUR name, as it is filled with assertions not based in fact; opinion masked as truth; sloppy thinking, poor logic and an overall tone designed to demoralize American readers who have faith in you and your publication's efforts to bring worthwhile news and reporting to them.

If you want to lose advertisers and readers who are disgusted and revolted by cheap assertions and insinuations that Americans who choose integrity and keep their given word are SLAVES, then he's the one for you, though he insults you, too Sir! You meet the contractual requirements stipulated in YOUR agreement with the company which hired you, and YOU are not a mindless, gutless slave, are you?

I urge you to redirect Rivers' efforts to something more representative of America's valiant, positive, undeniably effective efforts in Iraq and elsewhere; have Rivers learn to look past minor setbacks to the larger good being done with and for the great majority of previously downtrodden Iraqis and Afghanis, who today boldly acknowledge their gratitude and joy at our presence in their nations and our efforts at helping them to help themselves.

Or let him go, to some leftist rag where he can vent, spew bile and disparage America on someone else's time and stop wasting YOUR time and
money."

Today I read in my local newspaper that an arm of the Nat'l Council of Churches plans to launch a TV ad on Arabic television stations tomorrow to apologize for the mistreatment of Iraqi prisoners by Americans. "We condemn the sinful and systemic abuses committed in our name".

This is the body of the e-mail message that I've sent to them and the address of the organization. I hope we can flood their site with protests.

As an American citizen, I strenuously object to your purported message to the Arab media apologizing for the actions of a few Americans who humiliated Arab prisoners.

The reasons are many. It brings discredit on the millions of American servicemen in all wars who have treated prisoners with respect and dignity. It fans the prejudice of a people whose hearts and minds we are trying to change by giving them the opportunity of a kind of freedom and choice of destiny that they've never known. If I understand the news account of your message, you say nothing about the torture and death that these muslim terrorists mete out to their American hostages.

Isn't it incumbant on you to denounce the treatment of American & allied prisoners as well and compare the two - one who puts a hood on a prisoners' head and the other who beheads the prisoner??

All I can say is, "Shame On You!" You certainly will have signed the death sentence of many women and men who fall into the hands of these terrorists.

Sylvia Nixon
Oakdale, Ca

Website & e-mail: www.FaithfulAmerica.org

350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
  • Sylvia Nixon: Today I read in my local newspaper that an arm read more
  • SharpShooter: I complained to the editor! Text follows: "Sir, A Reggie read more
  • Jos: Reggie's good buddy at the Denver Post, Dani Newsum (a read more
  • JosephMendiola: And how is KERRY 's proposal to raise the active read more
  • BloodSpite: I think hook gave it to him very well and read more
  • JG: No contest. Sgt Hook is "da Man". There is a read more
  • Sgt Hook: Thanks for the heads up Hawk. I'll make time for read more
  • Laughing Wolf: I agree Tammi! Jerk is too nice a word, btw... read more
  • Tammi: I think this jerk needs to go spend some quality read more

MBC2010.jpg

MILBLOGS NEWS

*****

Latest Posts From MilBlogs

*****

milblogsa1.jpg Prev | List | Random | Next
Join
Powered by RingSurf!
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004