
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! March 25, 2004 All is ForgivenBy GreyhawkI first saw the headline over this story I thought it might be another example of unfounded Kerry-bashing. Really, there are abundant legitimate reasons to find the man completely unfit for high office - why stretch the claim for feeble attacks? But on reading the first few paragraphs I realized the authors had a strong case for another example of "the man for all seasons". Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry made a stop at a Catholic church during his Idaho vacation Sunday to attend Mass, loudly arriving 11 minutes late and wearing a ski suit. Expect hypothetical "President Kerry" to one-up the Clintons at every opportunity. One day "abortion rights" advocates will likely make a case for biblical support for a "woman's right to choose". (That would be revisionist history far exceeding what's being suggested by the "Clinton was tough on terror" crowd.) The schism that follows will produce a church more theologically acceptable to Senator Kerry. Update: Mike (in comments - thanks Mike) points out that Kerry was able to make it back to DC just in time to cast a vote. And indeed he did, a vote against H.R. 1997 (Laci and Conner's Law) "A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, and the Uniform Code of Military Justice to protect unborn children from assault and murder, and for other purposes". Senator Kerry must have hurried back so fast that the holy water on his hands could scarce have had time to dry. We must assume he took time to change out of his ski suit, or at least to have brushed the crumbs of the communion wafer onto the Senate floor. We can only guess, because although an incredible amount of media coverage has been given to the trial of Laci's husband (and Connor's father) there has been little if any major media mention of this part of Kerry's week. But given that a roll call appearance by Kerry is an exceptionally rare event one can grant the pool reporters some slack; they may not have recognized the gentleman from Massachusetts. Reporters were able to catch up with the speedy candidate later in the evening as he joined with numerous other nay voters, two former presidents, and he who almost was in a celebration of hope for the future. A good time was had by all. Update: More here. Thoughtful and dead-on-balls accurate. (It's an industry term...) Posted by Greyhawk / March 25, 2004 8:23 PM | Permalink 7 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
"Forgive me fadda, for I have sinnned. By the way, how much time ya got?"
How well I remember the Clintons and Gores in the cathedral, golf clapping (or staring at the stained glass) throughout the eulogy.
And a throwback to a joke you told here a while back: "Compared to Kerry, those guys are Saints!"
"Don't you know who I am!?"
Sorry, I had to do that.
Democrats are really a one-issue party: abortion. Kerry actually made it back to the Senate today to vote against a bill limiting abortion-on-demand. The only vote he's made since his campaign began.
This is nothing new for the Democrats... I remember waaaayyyy back in the mists of time. My mother watching the Kennedy's in church (he might've been catholic, but my parents still couldn't stand him - and he's tame by today's standards). Anyhow, one of the Kennedy women, who was divorced, received communion - my mother was livid. All she could talk about was how the Kennedy's could just do anything even violate church rules... Kerry is just continuing the tradition of the ones he admires most.
I wonder if Kerry's base will be alienated by his appearance in a church, or will they accept it as a "necessary evil" of the campaign trail?
I am certainly not a Kerry supporter, but I do not think that making false claims about him is wise. The story you quoted says "The Democrat also received Holy Communion during Mass at Our Lady of the Snows Catholic Church, despite the fact he is not a Catholic in good standing, reported LifeSiteNews.com."
To be a "Catholic in good standing" is a very specific thing, meaning essentially that one is entitled to take Communion. In practice, for most Catholics, to be "not a Catholic in good standing" would mean that you have not gone to confession in a while (and have something to confess).
I searched the LifeSiteNews.com site, and did not find any reference to a "fact" that John Kerry is not in good standing. There are several mentions of Archbishops who said they would not give him Communion because of his stand on abortion and other issues, but that is specific to those Archbishops and those dioceses. While I might agree with them that he is not a good Catholic, that is not the same as "not a Catholic in good standing."
In a Time article located at http://www.time.com/time/election2004/article/0,18471,605436,00.html, I found this quote:
"He is enough of a stickler for Catholic rules to have sought an annulment of his 18-year first marriage before marrying again."
Again, I'm not too thrilled with the notion that you can annul an 18-year marriage, but somebody gave him that annulment, so that is a moot point. If he is really a stickler for Catholic rules, I find it unlikely that he would have neglected going to confession or doing any other minor thing that would not leave him in good standing to receive communion.
I think this is an important point, especially in the context of your post. Coming to mass in a ski suit is obnoxious, but not really that big a deal especially in a resort town. My mother lives in Branson, MO, and the priests and congregation would most assuredly rather have you show up for Mass than stay away because you are not dressed right. Coming late is certainly obnoxious, having a superficial motive (a photo-op) is obnoxious, but only obnoxious.
Taking communion when you are not "in good standing" is much more than obnoxious. If it were true, that would be considered by most Catholics to be a serious infraction, and would definitely hurt Kerry in terms of the Catholic vote. So, if it's true, it's important, but if it's not true, it should be so noted in your post.
Thanks.