
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! March 22, 2004 More on Peace MarchesBy GreyhawkNote: A previous entry here, including reports from my corner of the world. A couple of illuminating comments from Smash's entry on the protests: There are always freaks at these events, But don't let that blind you to the truth. and Yes, please don't take these people as the norm. There are extremists and morons who don't know how things really are on both sides of the issues. Liberals like me have to deal with people like these, and conservatives have to deal with people such as extremists within the religious right. Exceptions to the rule? Extremist? Comparable to those on the religious right? You decide. Start with a mirror of the overloaded San Francisco photo site, via Swanky Conservative. Then visit Michael Totten, who has a collection of photos from anti-war rallies from around the world. (A commenter on Totten's blog dismisses them as "mostly foreign".) Matt Margolis, Aaron and Tyler and others joined with a recently returned OIF vet in crashing the NY protest. They handed out Bush/Cheney buttons along the way. Much to our surprise, as we walked back across the viewing area of Ground Zero, our worst fears were realized, for the protesters were standing in front of Ground Zero, with bullhorns, screaming words of hate and swearing, holding utterly tasteless signs in the shadows of the worst domestic attack of terrorism on American soil. One of those signs was a "Stop Bush" banner with the 's' in Bush replaced with a swastika. Not the norm? Out of the mainstream? For humanity, yes; for the left, no. And it should surprise no one that it's impossible to differentiate between the "throngs" in New York and their cousins across the Atlantic (on my current side of the pond, if you will), captured here. Though there is a subtle difference in the Australian crowds. Which reminds me: Note to British and American socialists: Could you please remember to include Australian PM John Howard in your next "Axis of Evil" signs and banners? Really, your Aussie Komrades are feeling "left" out. Get it? Haha! But really, visit the links, and after a while you'll realize they're all the same. Books, hate-filed signs, slogans, support of "Palestine", Bush is a Nazi! But fortunately, there's another similarity. Take a close look at the following two pictures and see what the "young socialists" literally "carrying the banners of their cause" have in common. London (left) and San Fran (also left, but not below) ![]() ![]() "Young" socialists? And while Blackfive found himself almost alone at the Chicago rally, another youngster discovered she was "an Army of One" Even with the rallies planned well in advance, at least one protester got a little lost. Just wait another 20 years, darlin'. Update: Via Instapundit, more youngsters reliving the glory days of 'Nam. Well, at least what they heard about 'Nam. Nice try, morons. Guess where those big sticks would be if I was at your protest? Finally, sorry, I can't resist. From the San Francisco collection, the protestors have endorsed Not Bush for President: ![]() Posted by Greyhawk / March 22, 2004 11:27 PM | Permalink 4 TrackBacksIt was 216 miles to New York, we had a full tank of gas, rally signs, it was sunny, and we were wearing our Bush-Cheney buttons. The four of us (Free Republic member Javene, Tyler from Pardon My English and Matt from MattMargolis.com), hit the road fro... Read More Greyhawk at the Mudville Gazette has more on the protests. I found his update at the end to be very amusing. Darren Kaplan has a thoughtful post about the possibility of President Bush being able to actually prevent 9/11. Drill Read More There were a few "anti-war" protests this weekend. None in Washington, I'm afraid, but a few dozen people apparently showed up in San Francisco and New York. Pretty much the hard core of the enemy's propaganda machine. Five. Minutes. Alone. Apparently,... Read More Yesterday, I went to New York City with a few friends from Boston to counter-protest International ANSWER's anti-war/ anti-Bush/ pro-palestine/ anti-Israel/ pro-Mumia/ anti-capitalism/ pro-socialism/ pro-comunism /anti-America/ anti-Republican/ anti... Read More 10 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
If the digusting signs and comments reflect a minority of the protestors, why haven't the majority forced the disgusting people out? Shouldn't there be a degree of social pressure, an attitude of "iew, get that filth away from me"?
Nope. It's the mainstream left in action. And they don't like being exposed like this, because while the New York Times and others simply refer to them as "peaceful protestors" (which they no doubt were) it's the blogs that expose them for the peaceful, traitorous, bloodthirsty moonbats they are.
Sorry, folks, but the left has these guys, and the right has the KKK.
Maybe I'll blog the next Aryan Nations meeting.
Aryan Nations -- yes, well -- I can bet you a year's pay if the AN, KKK and the other over- the -edge "right wing wackos" were parading around with vile signs like those you'd hear plenty of criticism and condemnation *from the right* / conservatives. I don't hear, read, or see any criticism from Democrats, liberals and/or the "left" about these things.
For instance -- Anyone heard from the ladies of the "September 11th Famiies for Peaceful Tomorrows?" about the NY sign? Funny there is no outrage about "I {love} NY Even More Without the World Trade Center" and the Israel and Bush signs with that oh-so-clever swastika instead of an S.
Someone on another blog wondered what so many disparate groups have in common. Answer: They hate America. And they hate George W. Bush. So I guess they hate a lot of you and me.
And remember -- it's all about Peace and Love, dudes.
Yeah, Reddy, I remember marching with the KKK in all those pro-war rallies.
Sorry to break the news Redseven but most of the aryans and neo-nazis are not so closeted socialist. Oh not in the red baby pre-marxist mold, but in the good old fashioned NATIONAL SOCIALIST mode of you-do-what-I-say-or-I-squash-you-with-the-apparatus-of-the-state totalitarianism, you know these guys, they are the ones carrying the red banners, and they are peoples of the reactionary LEFT. They have absolutely nothing to do with republicans or conservatives.
I live in a city (DC) where marches happen all the time. We have crazies on the left and right. It's hard for march organizers to control the message, so you're always going to get some fringe views expressed on signs etc.
Too bad that protesters on both sides get poked fun at like this because of the weirdos. These photo essays don't show the families and "regular" people with more "moderate" signs you tend to see more often. This applies to pro-life marchers and anti-war marchers and disability rights marchers and pro-Israel marchers, etc.
Call me crazy but I like an America where peaceful dissent is permitted and encouraged.
The genious of having the Republican National Convention in NY, after the Democrats have theirs, is the wackiest of the wacky will turn out in droves to protest. I think everytime they turn out with the puppetshow and illiterate signs Bush goes up in the polls.
In order to defend the left, you criticize the right, Right? Nobody was ever saved by someone elses sin. To point to something ( or someone) else as being as bad or worse, in order to excuse your own lack of responsibility is pure schoolyard idiocy. The left won't take responsibility for these 'extremists', because they secretely applaud them. They only pretend to distance themselves from such activity so as to appear legitimate. These people are traitorous.
ruprecht touches on a very valid point. Protesting has a negative effect on the cause championed. Funnily enough, in the days leading up to the Iraq war, public sentiment would shift to support the war every time a protest against it occurred.
Public protest, at least in this country, is counterproductive. You get farther with a well written letter to your reprasentative. I have zero fear that the majority of the Left is capable of writing such a letter.