
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! February 17, 2004 PolitaryBy GreyhawkUpdate: A commenter has noted that the original linked story has been pulled and replaced by AP or Yahoo. Whether for editorial, style, content, or moral reasons is debatable. (In fact the story now linked includes several "Bush wasn't AWOL" testimonials from Guard members.) You'll have to take my word that the quoted portions I included here from the original are verbatim. Will seek another source. (But could the Blogosphere have brought this one down?) Update #2 Here's a link to the original story. Meanwhile here's a link to another (apparently edited) version of the Lindlaw story. Glenn Reynolds notes that Scott Lindlaw, the reporter who brought us yesterday's coverage of our traveling president is (ahem) reporting again. (And this time the story was presented with Kerry's response, thus preventing Scott Ott from pre-satirizing it.) FORT POLK, La. - President Bush sought to buck up troop morale at a base that has supplied more than 10,000 soldiers to the war on terrorism — and lost a dozen in Iraq - vowing Tuesday that "the enemy will be defeated." Note the distinction between the "War on Terror" and the "War in Iraq". Iraq is part of the war on terror. Sorry. Can't let that one slip by, and it's only the first example of editorializing the Democrat's message into the piece. Or perhaps that's just balance. After all, the War with Germany was different from the War with Japan, right? The president: "My resolve is the same as it was on the day when I walked in the rubble of the twin towers," Bush said, his voice breaking. "I will not relent until this threat to America is removed." And please allow me to explain that the 'hoo-ah' is a vocal show of enthusiastic agreement; "hearty howls of hoo-ah", however, is an alliterative no-no. Now puzzle with me over this paragraph order. See if you can find the one our ace reporter couldn't find a proper place for. After trying to quell stories about his Vietnam-era military record, Bush sought Tuesday to put that controversy behind him by having lunch with members of the National Guard. Shoehorning, anyone? Like reporters in the mess hall, it just doesn't fit. Frank: Wilma, I promise you, whatever scumbag did this, not one man on this force will rest for one minute until he's behind bars. Now lets go grab a bite to eat. In his defense, the intrepid reporter could have been a bit shell-shocked by the decibel level of the cheers. Louder then at Daytona, if that's possible. Or perhaps he was stunned by Guard member reaction to the AWOL story buried here: Some soldiers said in interviews they didn't care about the controversy. Some? And where are the quotes from the 'some' that did care? Ex-Vietnam Veteran John Kerry cares. And he continues to speak from a bizarro world where the cheering is for him. Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry has kept silent on the flap in recent days, but he used Bush's trip to Louisiana to criticize the president's treatment of the military. Wow, third person references. He's channeling Bob Dole and Mike Dukakis. Kerry said Bush's policies had threatened to undermine troops' pay, health care and battlefield protection. The 198,000-acre base here houses the Army's Joint Readiness Training Center for training exercises with the Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force. The final line of the story and fact is brought out? Does this enhance credibility? Are there pro-Bush reporters covering Kerry? Okay, I'd really like to address the issues. Can anyone answer these questions: What is the Kerry platform? In light of the real time broadcast of the cheers, what does Kerry gain from not just shutting up? Is he really claiming that the troops would love him more? Obviously the individual members of the military overwhelmingly (admittedly not 100% but 90% is a likely number) approve of the President's prosecution of the war on terror. Kerry believes otherwise; can someone please tell me why I should think Kerry's positions are grounded in reality? Finally can someone give me a compelling argument that this man is fit to start a NASCAR race? Because I currently have no question about his fitness to command the US military. Really, this is your chance. Convince me. Posted by Greyhawk / February 17, 2004 10:04 PM | Permalink 16 Comments |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |
Awfully quiet here...
* chirp, chirp *
Just checking in. Sorry. Nothing here.., going on about my business now.
But any minute now, I'm sure...
Huh. AP replaced the Lindlaw thing with a straightforward piece of reporting by Terence Hunt. They got caught and they know it.
Thanks for shining some more light on that media sleazeball. Did you miss one, though? What did he mean by that reference to "rowdy" as opposed to "enthusiastic" troops visited by their Commander in Chief. Doesn't that somehow imply that National Guard personnel are less disciplined and just not quite the same as the "real" military?
Well Mike, down there in them Loo-sana swamps they do tend to get a little rowdy now n then...
Gator wrasslers, don't ya know?
By the way I spent some time at Polk. It sucked, I liked it.
Still waiting, by the way...
Don't think I'll come back again to read this drivel...
Greyhawk: Hope you are really patient because Kerry is by no stretch of the imagination fit to be POTUS. Personally, I don't understand the support he has gotten. God help the USofA if he is elected to the oval office.
Patient I am. But I'm sure tomorrow somebody will have something to add...
But i guess it won't be Jim.
Sorry Jim.
I can touch on one:
"What is the Kerry platform?"
Well he seems to state that here:
"With Kerry, veterans will have a veteran in the White House who fights to make sure they get the benefits they deserve,"
I think he wants to retire all the military and make sure they get pension checks. I say this because he seems very concerned about veterans more than those currently serving. Note the past tense here:
"John Kerry will keep America's promise to those who served their country bravely,"
Last I checked, many are still serving their country bravely, and they deserve to have America keep its promise while in the midst of battle. Kerry's record is pretty plain on what he thinks about promises to troops in the field. He voted not to provide additional funds.
This is why I again conclude that his platform is to retire the military. I do support his idea that that all members should receive due benefits. It would be nice if they looked similar to his Senatorial pension. I am curious about how he plans to get around the Constitution on the issue of an Army and Navy, but then that would be an issue for Congress. He's running for President now.
Leland,
Concur yr analysis.
Kerry would, if he could possibly swing it, end the cruel domination foisted upon the world by America's bloodthirsty, cruel and racist military. Put them all away, then give them enough of a stipend to keep them alive til they die, but not enough so they could afford any of life's pleasures.
After all, they were once hired killers for Bush to use and manipulate, weren't they? Kerry, on the other hand, has blood.
I'm all for inceased veterans benefits. In many ways many have a raw deal. Kerry's words, (admitedly a sound bite) are the equivalent of Miss America wanting World Peace. Where's the "how"?
Hey GreyHawk, the thought of Kerry as CinC sends chills up my spine and not the good kind.
Nice voice, BTW (Heard you on the Hewitt show yesterday).