
![]() | |
October 2012
August 2012 July 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003 January 2003
|
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by! December 6, 2003 Choosing SidesBy GreyhawkMeet Abu Mujhid: "Wait fifteen minutes," Abu Mujhid says after looking at his watch. Sipping a 7-UP soda after having broken his Ramadan fast just after nightfall in mid-November, Abu Mujhid -- not his real name -- has just been challenged by a reporter to prove he commands a resistance cell that performs violent attacks on American troops occupying his home town of Baghdad. Yup, according to UPI, the individual calmly sipping the un-cola with ace reporter P. Mitchell Prothero is a "top member of an anti-U.S. Iraqi guerrilla group" Sixteen minutes after Abu Mujhid told UPI to wait, four mortar rounds fired from a southwestern Baghdad neighborhood about 3 miles away flew overhead, landing in the compound of the U.S.-led Coalition Provisional Authority. Bet the farm: He said "Allah" but the UPI "translated". Also note the mortar timing was off by a minute. Let's read more from our intrepid freedom fighter: "Saddam, I liked him. He was a strong leader," he says. For a minute I'll pretend a this former Baathist has repented from his sins and now wants a free Iraq, and ask why he's turned against the Americans, who want the same thing: "They promised to liberate us from occupation, they promised us rights and liberty and my colleagues and I waited to make our decision on whether to fight until we saw how they would act." Ahhhh, he got tired of waiting. After all those years of Saddam's rule I guess he's used to things being done quickly. Now nearly 40 weeks after the invasion he's not satisfied with the rate of change. "They should have come and just given us food and some security," he said. "Even today I feel like I cannot drive my car at night because of Ali Baba (the Baghdad slang for criminals)." So, given the opportunity to fight back, instead of confronting that criminal element he attacks the US for supposedly allowing the criminal element to thrive. Sorry, no ring of truth there. Abu is a man with an agenda. And he is certainly not concerned with security in Baghdad, of that we can be sure. And what about Saddam? Isn't he concerned about working for Saddam? "We are told that Saddam might be at the top of the organization," he says. "I don't know if I believe that but my colleague has seen Saddam," he said. "He comes to tell my colleagues to continue to fight. But we look at him as a strong leader. But we don't want him back." Well, maybe if Saddam comes back he'll be even angrier and you'll be first into the shredder, Abu-al-Einstein. But you've really been for him all along, haven't you? Something tells me you'd be first in line to kiss the soles of his shoes if he sat once more upon his golden throne. Speaking of golden thrones, who's financing your group, Abu? "We have to find ways to get our own money to buy weapons," he says. "The Baath Party members at the top were rich, but I don't think many of them help us fight. They don't send us money or weapons." Not sure what equipment he's buying, but as far as that whole "killing GI's thing" goes, Abu wants his allies in America to know it's nothing personal: "But my colleagues and I don't hate the American people or even most of the soldiers," he says. "We just want them out of our land. If they promised to leave in one month and hold elections we would put down our arms. I don't want to kill anyone else. I don't want American to hate Iraq. I would wait to see if they left." Do you really think "Peace be unto you" in Arabic will save our soldiers from these guys? I think our best defense is a good offense, like Operation IRON HAMMER. "We have lost more men to these strikes and in arrests," he says. "One of our men was waiting to ambush a U.S. Humvee, when he was arrested. He was carrying a heavy machine gun, which is forbidden." But not to worry, poor Abu has to cash for things other then "equipment": But the man -- a guerrilla -- has a permit from the coalition to carry an AK-47 but was caught with a heavy machine gun. Abu Mujahid says his men paid an Iraqi translator $600 to replace the heavy gun with an AK-47 so their colleague can go free. Abu Mujahid expected the man to be released the next day. Six hundred is big bucks in Iraq. By way of comparison, FALLUJAH, Iraq – Like many Iraqi government employees, police 1st Lt. Ahmed Qassem faces a tough choice as he starts every workday: Stay at home and dramatically increase his chances of staying alive, or go to work and collect a $65 monthly paycheck. Nice that the reporter has insight into the man's state of mind. But could it be possible that not everyone in Iraq choses to hop down Abu Mujhid's bunny trail? "This is our job, our duty. If I could make money doing something else, I would quit today," he said. Frightening, since the "opposition" has money. Lt. Qassem is among the thousands of Iraqis trained and employed by the Coalition Provisional Authority, or CPA, the U.S.-led government that has kept Iraq running since the fall of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in April. Read this next bit carefully: "In my opinion, the one who resists the occupiers is good. It is the thieves and looters who are bad. Our job is only to fight the thieves and looters," said Fallujah police Sgt. Fuad Naameh. At 65 bucks a month, these officers are willing to stop thieves and looters but not the Abu Mujhids. And "cooperating with the Americans" is becomming increasingly dangerous. Sheik Ihsan Mudallat, a leading Sunni Muslim cleric in Fallujah and a vocal supporter of the insurgency, suggested that anyone who works with occupation forces understands the risks. The answer from one senior official: Gen. Ahmad Qadhim, the senior deputy interior minister, said he resented the notion that cooperating with occupation authorities somehow branded him as a traitor. He proudly displays photos on his office wall of himself next to senior U.S. officials, including Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defense secretary who visited Iraq in October and narrowly escaped injury during a rocket attack on his hotel. "We work with the coalition forces, but we do not work for them," Gen. Qadhim said. "I work for my country." Nevertheless, he said he has been the subject of death threats from Mr. Hussein. Men of Qadhim's caliber deserve our support. Were we to follow the advice of so many of Abu Mujhid's employers' allies in America, we'd be gone, and Qadhim would be fed feet first into the shredder by Mujhid, while Saddam looked on drooling. U.S. Army Col. Ralph Baker, of the 40th Engineer Battalion based in Baumholder, Germany, suggested that the U.S. presence gives many Iraqi civilians cause for concern as they carry out their work alongside their foreign counterparts. The sides are chosen, the lines are drawn... Posted by Greyhawk / December 6, 2003 7:00 AM | Permalink |
November 26, 2010America@war [Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit. That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary. From their about page:
"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation: The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism. Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented. I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are. "Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result. Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web... And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed. The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down. But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:
Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down. If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real. And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale. We've already made history, it's time to save it. (More to follow...) Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink |
Comments (0) |
|
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
![]() Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house. I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email. Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed. Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com ![]() Tending Distant Far from hearth and home, watching What tales we'll tell When things grim Some distant sunset, vision fading Saluting fallen friends whose names - Greyhawk, Baghdad, December 2004 |