The reader will kindly forgive any tendency to rough language or behavior on the part of the site owner...
TMGlogo2006-2007phs-copy.jpg
"Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
TMGbloglabel1 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel3 copy.gif
TMG MONTHLY ARCHIVES
[-]



TMGbloglabel10 copy.gif

TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette Feeds

 

Add to Technorati Favorites
Technorati Profile
add.gif
Add to Google
addtomyyahoo4.gif
ngsub1.gif sub_modern5.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

digg.jpg

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

pl-news.gif

tvc_logo_small.png

Mrsg- Greyhawk's Profile
Mrsg- Greyhawk's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge
TMGbloglabel5 copy.gif
TMGbloglabel6 copy.gif
350.jpg
Greetings! You are reading an article from The Mudville Gazette. To reach the front page, with all the latest news and views, click the logo above or "main" below. Thanks for stopping by!
« Another new addition | Main | Buy a clue »

December 6, 2003

greyhawk copy sm.png

Choosing Sides

By Greyhawk

Meet Abu Mujhid:

"Wait fifteen minutes," Abu Mujhid says after looking at his watch. Sipping a 7-UP soda after having broken his Ramadan fast just after nightfall in mid-November, Abu Mujhid -- not his real name -- has just been challenged by a reporter to prove he commands a resistance cell that performs violent attacks on American troops occupying his home town of Baghdad.

Yup, according to UPI, the individual calmly sipping the un-cola with ace reporter P. Mitchell Prothero is a "top member of an anti-U.S. Iraqi guerrilla group"

Sixteen minutes after Abu Mujhid told UPI to wait, four mortar rounds fired from a southwestern Baghdad neighborhood about 3 miles away flew overhead, landing in the compound of the U.S.-led Coalition Provisional Authority.

"God willing we hit something this time," he says, wryly smiling. "Our mortars are very inaccurate. We cannot wait to aim them, so we use timers.

Bet the farm: He said "Allah" but the UPI "translated". Also note the mortar timing was off by a minute. Let's read more from our intrepid freedom fighter:

"Saddam, I liked him. He was a strong leader," he says.

"But I was in the Baath Party and I knew that his men, mostly even Saddam's sons, were corrupt. They stole and stole from the Iraqi people.

For a minute I'll pretend a this former Baathist has repented from his sins and now wants a free Iraq, and ask why he's turned against the Americans, who want the same thing:

"They promised to liberate us from occupation, they promised us rights and liberty and my colleagues and I waited to make our decision on whether to fight until we saw how they would act."

But for Abu Mujhid and his men these things never materialized.

Ahhhh, he got tired of waiting. After all those years of Saddam's rule I guess he's used to things being done quickly. Now nearly 40 weeks after the invasion he's not satisfied with the rate of change.

"They should have come and just given us food and some security," he said. "Even today I feel like I cannot drive my car at night because of Ali Baba (the Baghdad slang for criminals)."

"It was then I realized that they had come as occupiers and not as liberators," he says. "And my colleagues and I then voted to fight. So we began to meet and plan. We met with others and have tried to buy weapons. None of us are afraid to die, but it is hard. We are just men, workers, not soldiers."

So, given the opportunity to fight back, instead of confronting that criminal element he attacks the US for supposedly allowing the criminal element to thrive.

Sorry, no ring of truth there. Abu is a man with an agenda. And he is certainly not concerned with security in Baghdad, of that we can be sure.

And what about Saddam? Isn't he concerned about working for Saddam?

"We are told that Saddam might be at the top of the organization," he says. "I don't know if I believe that but my colleague has seen Saddam," he said. "He comes to tell my colleagues to continue to fight. But we look at him as a strong leader. But we don't want him back."

But when asked if he thinks Saddam leads the resistance, he laughs.

"I think Saddam is too busy hiding," he says. "I think that the leaders above me are former generals who want to replace Saddam when the Americans leave."

"We actually took a vote at a meeting last week," he says, laughing. "If the Americans leave and Saddam comes back, we will fight him too. Maybe if he were elected we'd allow it. But no one in Iraq wants Saddam back. He turned into a thief and a murderer who made too many mistakes. We don't want Saddam, but American cannot occupy us any longer."

Well, maybe if Saddam comes back he'll be even angrier and you'll be first into the shredder, Abu-al-Einstein. But you've really been for him all along, haven't you? Something tells me you'd be first in line to kiss the soles of his shoes if he sat once more upon his golden throne.

Speaking of golden thrones, who's financing your group, Abu?

"We have to find ways to get our own money to buy weapons," he says. "The Baath Party members at the top were rich, but I don't think many of them help us fight. They don't send us money or weapons."

"I have friends and colleagues who fight with the Army of Mohammed (a cell based in the Western Iraqi city of Fallujah) and they have more money for anti-aircraft weapons and explosives. Sometimes they help us, but mostly we are left to our own," he says.

But one source of support has been foreigners from other Arab countries.

In earlier interviews, Abu Mujahid acknowledged that both Syrian intelligence and al-Qaida members were operating in Iraq against the U.S.-led coalition forces but denied he received direct assistance from them. But in later interviews, he said he received support from some people he suspects have ties with terrorist organizations.

"In my neighborhood, we have many students from Yemen, Syria and Jordan," he says. "Several of them give us money to buy weapons and conduct operations."

When asked if he thought these students were members or supporters of al-Qaida, he smiles and shrugs.

"How does a student living in Iraq get money to give to me to buy RPG-7s (an anti-tank rocket common in the region)?" he asks. "They have to get their money somewhere. The Syrian ones I think they get money from their government, but we get some money from Yemenis and Saudis. I think they must belong to al-Qaida to have such money. But I don't ask such things. I don't like Osama bin Laden and don't want to fight jihad against America. The Iraqi people just want the Americans to leave our country."

He has, however, used the money to send men to Saudi Arabia to buy equipment.

Not sure what equipment he's buying, but as far as that whole "killing GI's thing" goes, Abu wants his allies in America to know it's nothing personal:

"But my colleagues and I don't hate the American people or even most of the soldiers," he says. "We just want them out of our land. If they promised to leave in one month and hold elections we would put down our arms. I don't want to kill anyone else. I don't want American to hate Iraq. I would wait to see if they left."

"There have been some that say 'hello' or 'peace be unto you' in Arabic to me," he says. "They give our children sweets and do their jobs with respect. One of these men I even see as my friend. So we were conducting an operation, about to shoot at a Humvee one night when I realized it was the nice soldier. I told my man not to shoot him.

Do you really think "Peace be unto you" in Arabic will save our soldiers from these guys? I think our best defense is a good offense, like Operation IRON HAMMER.

"We have lost more men to these strikes and in arrests," he says. "One of our men was waiting to ambush a U.S. Humvee, when he was arrested. He was carrying a heavy machine gun, which is forbidden."

But not to worry, poor Abu has to cash for things other then "equipment":

But the man -- a guerrilla -- has a permit from the coalition to carry an AK-47 but was caught with a heavy machine gun. Abu Mujahid says his men paid an Iraqi translator $600 to replace the heavy gun with an AK-47 so their colleague can go free. Abu Mujahid expected the man to be released the next day.

Six hundred is big bucks in Iraq. By way of comparison,
(Reg req, use greyhawk and mudville)

FALLUJAH, Iraq – Like many Iraqi government employees, police 1st Lt. Ahmed Qassem faces a tough choice as he starts every workday: Stay at home and dramatically increase his chances of staying alive, or go to work and collect a $65 monthly paycheck.

With great reluctance, he chooses the paycheck.

Nice that the reporter has insight into the man's state of mind. But could it be possible that not everyone in Iraq choses to hop down Abu Mujhid's bunny trail?

"This is our job, our duty. If I could make money doing something else, I would quit today," he said.

Frightening, since the "opposition" has money.

Lt. Qassem is among the thousands of Iraqis trained and employed by the Coalition Provisional Authority, or CPA, the U.S.-led government that has kept Iraq running since the fall of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in April.

Read this next bit carefully:

"In my opinion, the one who resists the occupiers is good. It is the thieves and looters who are bad. Our job is only to fight the thieves and looters," said Fallujah police Sgt. Fuad Naameh.

Both he and Lt. Qassem stand guard each day outside the dilapidated building housing Fallujah's governing council, a U.S.-appointed body whose leader resigned last month after receiving repeated death threats. Fallujah, 35 miles west of Baghdad, is a hotbed of support for Mr. Hussein.

"We're not cooperating with the Americans," Lt. Qassem said. "Whenever they come here, we leave because we know they are going to be attacked. I'm not saying they are the enemy, but they are the occupiers."

At 65 bucks a month, these officers are willing to stop thieves and looters but not the Abu Mujhids. And "cooperating with the Americans" is becomming increasingly dangerous.

Sheik Ihsan Mudallat, a leading Sunni Muslim cleric in Fallujah and a vocal supporter of the insurgency, suggested that anyone who works with occupation forces understands the risks.

"We don't want this government in Fallujah. We want our own government, one that rules all of Iraq," he said. Asked whether he regarded Iraqis working for the coalition as legitimate targets, he responded with a shrug and a smile. "Ask them," he said.

The answer from one senior official:

Gen. Ahmad Qadhim, the senior deputy interior minister, said he resented the notion that cooperating with occupation authorities somehow branded him as a traitor. He proudly displays photos on his office wall of himself next to senior U.S. officials, including Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defense secretary who visited Iraq in October and narrowly escaped injury during a rocket attack on his hotel. "We work with the coalition forces, but we do not work for them," Gen. Qadhim said. "I work for my country." Nevertheless, he said he has been the subject of death threats from Mr. Hussein.

He quoted the latest taped message purportedly from Mr. Hussein, received on Nov. 27, as saying, "We must go to Gen. Ahmad, destroy all of his buildings and kill him directly."

"I have 12 bodyguards. Saddam has 12,000. ... Here is my message to Saddam: Go ahead. I'm not afraid," Gen. Qadhim said. "OK, kill me. I do this for my country."

Men of Qadhim's caliber deserve our support. Were we to follow the advice of so many of Abu Mujhid's employers' allies in America, we'd be gone, and Qadhim would be fed feet first into the shredder by Mujhid, while Saddam looked on drooling.

U.S. Army Col. Ralph Baker, of the 40th Engineer Battalion based in Baumholder, Germany, suggested that the U.S. presence gives many Iraqi civilians cause for concern as they carry out their work alongside their foreign counterparts.

During a meeting two weeks ago of a district advisory council in central Baghdad, Col. Baker announced that the U.S. government had agreed to abolish the CPA in June, handing over full governing authority to Iraqis.

The council chairman, Abdul Amir Suaidy, said he welcomed the help Col. Baker and his staff had provided in organizing the council and insisted he was not afraid to die working alongside the Americans. Unless Iraqis cooperate and get to work on the thousands of needed reconstruction projects, he said, Iraq will be easy prey for its enemies. "They are afraid of democracy in Iraq," he said of the insurgents. "So they try as much as possible to prevent this democratic experiment from succeeding. ... We are not afraid. We know we are right."

The sides are chosen, the lines are drawn...


Posted by Greyhawk / December 6, 2003 7:00 AM | Permalink
350.jpg
Mrs G copy.png

November 26, 2010


America@war
[Greyhawk]
I think anyone who's ever pondered the "comment" option - once only available on blogs and bulletin boards, now ubiquitous on almost any web site - will appreciate this:
The so-called faculty of writing is not so much a faculty of writing as it is a faculty of thinking. When a man says, "I have an idea but I can't express it"; that man hasn't an idea but merely a vague feeling. If a man has a feeling of that kind, and will sit down for a half an hour and persistently try to put into writing what he feels, the probabilities are at least 90 percent that he will either be able to record it, or else realize that he has no idea at all. In either case, he will do himself a benefit.

That's wisdom from the past, captured for posterity at the US Naval Institute, shared via the web on the institute's 137th anniversary.

From their about page:

The Naval Institute shall remain

INDEPENDENT - A non-profit member association, with no government support, that does not lobby for special interests;

NON-PARTISAN - An independent, professional military association with a mission, goals and objectives that transcend political affiliations; and shall encourage

IDEAS - Through its respected journals Proceedings and Naval History, its conferences, its books and its online content, in support of those who serve.

"The Naval Institute has three core activities," among them, History and Preservation:

The Naval Institute also has recently introduced Americans at War, a living history of Americans at war in their own words and from their own experiences. These 90-second vignettes convey powerful stories of inspiration, pride, and patriotism.

Take a look at the collection, and you'll see it's not limited to accounts from those who served on ships at sea, members of the other branches are well-represented.

I'm fortunate to have met USNI's Mary Ripley, she's responsible for the institute's oral history program (and she's the daughter of the late John Ripley, whose story is told here). She also deserves much credit for their blog. ("We're not the Navy nor any government agency. Blog and comment freely.") We met at a milblog conference - Mary knew (and I would come to realize) that milbloggers are the 21st-century version of exactly what the US Naval Institute is all about. Once that light bulb came on in my head, I mentioned a vague idea for a project to her - milblogs as the 21st century oral history that they are.

"Put that in writing," she said (of course - see first paragraph above!) - and here's part of the result.

Shortly after the first tent was pitched by the American military in Iraq a wire was connected to a computer therein, and the internet was available to a generation of Americans at war - many of whom had grown up online. From that point on, at any given moment, somewhere in Iraq a Soldier, Sailor, Airman or Marine was at a keyboard sharing the events of his or her day with the folks back home. While most would simply fire off an email, others took advantage of the (then) relatively new online blogging platforms to post their thoughts and experiences for the entire world to see. The milblog was born - and from that moment to this stories detailing everything from the most mundane aspects of camp life to intense combat action (often described within hours of the event) have been available on the web...

And et cetera - but since you're reading this on a milblog, you probably knew that. And you know that milblogs aren't just blogs written by troops at war, that many friends, family members, and supporters likewise documented their story of America at war online in near-real time, as those stories developed.

The diversity in membership of that group is broad, the one thing we all have in common is the impulse to make sense of the seemingly senseless, and communicate the tale - for each of us that impulse was strong enough to overcome whatever barriers prevent the vast majority of people from doing the same. Everyone at some point has some vague idea they believe should be shared - we were the people who, from some combination of internal and external urging, found and spent those many half hours persistently trying to write it down.

*****

But where will all that be in another 137 years? Or five or ten, for that matter. That's something I've asked myself since at least 2004 - when I wrote this:

Closing Blogs is nothing new. So many site's owners just give up on their own. They come and go, you know, these MilBloggers do. Like any other sort of blogger. Many post in the lonely down hours far from home, spill their guts for the world, then abandon their spots when the tour of duty is up. They have lives again somewhere in the world, and no need to share the details. So it goes.

Many are truly gone - no site left at all. "The page cannot be found." Other blogs remain, like abandoned defensive positions in shifting desert sands.

Membership in the ghost battalion has grown in the years since, and an ever growing majority of those abandoned-but-still-standing sites are vanishing. Have you checked out Lt Smash's site lately? How about Sgt Hook's? If you're a long-time milblog reader you know the first widely-read milblog from Operation Iraq Freedom and the first widely-read milblog from Afghanistan are both gone from the web. If you're a relative newcomer to this world you may never even have heard of them - or the dozens upon dozens of others who carried forth the standard they set down.

If you have a vague notion that something should be done about that, (a notion I've heard expressed more than once...) then you and I and the good folks at the US Naval Institute are in agreement. Preserving the history documented by the milbloggers is just one of the goals of the milblog project, the once-vague idea that we're now making real.

And it's a big idea, if I say so myself - too big to explain in one simple blog post, so stand by for more. Likewise, it's too big a task to be accomplished by just one person. So if you're a milblogger (and exactly what is a milblogger? is a topic for much further discussion on its own) I'm asking for your help. All I'll really need is just a little bit (maybe just one or two of those half hours...) of your time, and your willingness to tell the tale.

We've already made history, it's time to save it.

(More to follow...)




Posted 4:02 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) |

TMGbloglabel7copy.gif
The Mudville Gazette is the on-line voice of an American warrior and his wife who stands by him. They prefer to see peaceful change render force of arms unnecessary. Until that day they stand fast with those who struggle for freedom, strike for reason, and pray for a better tomorrow.
TMGrecentcomments.gif
TMGbloglabel2 copy.gif
The Dawn Patrol Feeds

 

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to netvibes Add to Plusmo myaol_cta1.gif

xml.gif rdf.png atom feed.jpg

TMGbloglabel8copy.gif

TMGbloglabel9 copy.gif
Blah Blah Blah
me220.JPG

The Mudville Gazette is written and produced by Greyhawk, who recently retired from 24 years of active duty in the US military, but will maintain this disclaimer: Unless otherwise credited, the opinions expressed are those of the author, and nothing here is to be taken as representing the official position of or endorsement by the United States Department of Defense or any of its subordinate components.

Furthermore, I will occasionally use satire or parody herein. The bottom line: it's my house.

I like having visitors to my house. I hope you are entertained. I fight for your right to free speech, and am thrilled when you exercise said rights here. Comments and e-mails are welcome, but all such communication is to be assumed to be 1)the original work of any who initiate said communication and 2)the property of the Mudville Gazette, with free use granted thereto for publication in electronic or written form. If you do NOT wish to have your message posted, write "CONFIDENTIAL" in the subject line of your email.

Original content copyright © 2003 - 2011 by Greyhawk. Fair, not-for-profit use of said material by others is encouraged, as long as acknowledgement and credit is given, to include the url of the original source post. Other arrangements can be made as needed.

Contact: greyhawk at mudvillegazette dot com

andsm.jpg

*****

Tending Distant
Fires


Far from hearth and home, watching
Cold alone but not alone
On distant shore and only wanting
Safe return and little more

What tales we'll tell
When that time comes
When tales can be told

When things grim
Seem far away
When other fires go cold

Some distant sunset, vision fading
Memories remain
And tired eyes gaze 'pon folded flags
While distant drums beat their refrain

Saluting fallen friends whose names
And youth will never fade
Here's to those on other shores,
for them live well, the price is paid

- Greyhawk,
Baghdad,
December 2004